Search Results

Proposition 65, officially known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Substances Enforcement Act of 1986, is a state regulation in California that has had a significant impact on industry, commerce, and consumers since its passage. This law was designed to protect California residents from exposure to chemicals that can cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm. In this article, we will explore in depth the background, objectives, operation, and implications of Proposition 65, highlighting its relevance to both manufacturers and consumers. Main objectives of Proposition 65 Operating Mechanisms Mandatory warnings Exceptions and security levels Impact on Industry and Consumers Implications for businesses Impact on consumers Controversies and Criticisms Evolution and Future of Proposition 65 Conclusion Main objectives of Proposition 65 Inform the public about the presence of hazardous chemicals in their environment, food or consumer products, so that they can make informed decisions. Prevent contamination of drinking water by regulating substances that may be hazardous to human health. Encourage manufacturers and distributors to reduce exposure to toxic substances by encouraging product reformulation and the elimination of harmful chemicals. Proposition 65 has become a key public health tool in California, requiring companies to warn consumers about potential risks associated with certain products and forcing industry to seek safer alternatives. Operating Mechanisms Proposition 65 operates through a system of warnings and regulations that companies must follow. Its central axis is a list of chemicals that the state of California considers carcinogenic or toxic to reproduction. This list is maintained and regularly updated by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). As of October 2024, the list contains over 900 chemicals. Mandatory warnings One of the key requirements of Proposition 65 is that companies must provide clear and reasonable warnings if their products contain any chemicals at levels that may pose a health risk. These warnings are often found on product labels, in stores, or on websites, and are easily recognized by the phrase: "WARNING: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm." "Warning: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects or other reproductive harm." Exceptions and security levels Although the law is strict about warnings, not all exposures require product labeling. OEHHA has established safe exposure levels, which indicate the minimum amounts of certain substances that do not pose a significant risk to health. If exposure to a substance is below these levels, no warning is required. Impact on Industry and Consumers Implications for businesses Proposition 65 has had a major impact on manufacturers, distributors, and retailers selling products in California. To comply with the law, many companies have chosen to reformulate their products to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals from their production lines, thereby avoiding the need to post warnings. In some cases, non-compliance can result in costly litigation, as Proposition 65 allows any citizen, organization, or environmental group to file lawsuits against companies that fail to comply with regulations. This has led to a high volume of litigation and financial penalties in cases of non-compliance, increasing pressure on companies to adjust their business practices. Impact on consumers For consumers, Prop 65 provides critical information about the risks associated with certain products. Warnings allow people to make informed decisions about what they buy, whether they choose to avoid products with warnings or simply become familiar with the potential risks. However, there has also been some criticism and confusion due to the number of warnings visible on common products, raising concerns about whether the warnings are being interpreted correctly or whether they cause unnecessary alarm. Controversies and Criticisms Despite its goal of protecting public health, Prop 65 is not without its critics. One of the most common complaints is that the law can lead to “over-warning,” meaning that many companies, to avoid legal risks, place warnings even on products with minimal exposures that do not pose a significant risk. This can dilute the impact of warnings and create confusion among consumers, who may not be able to distinguish between products that pose a real risk and those that are labeled as a precaution. . The law has also been criticized for giving rise to abusive lawsuits, known as "Proposition 65 lawsuits," where interest groups file mass litigation to obtain financial settlements from companies, regardless of the actual risk of exposure. Evolution and Future of Proposition 65 Prop 65 has been revised and adjusted several times since its implementation to improve its effectiveness and respond to criticism. Recently, the regulations have been updated to make warnings more specific, indicating the chemicals involved and potential health effects. Going forward, Proposition 65 is expected to continue to be a powerful tool in protecting public health, and other jurisdictions may consider adopting similar legislation. At the same time, the law will continue to evolve in response to the concerns of both consumers and businesses, balancing the need for clear and effective warnings with protection against excessive litigation. Conclusion California's Proposition 65 has set an important precedent for regulating hazardous chemicals in consumer products. Through its focus on transparency and prevention, it has incentivized companies to reformulate products to avoid public health risks and empowered consumers with valuable information about potential exposures. Despite criticism of warning overload and litigation, this law remains a fundamental pillar of environmental and health protection in the state of California. For businesses, compliance with Prop 65 is not only a legal imperative, but also an opportunity to improve the safety of their products and contribute to public health. For consumers, the law remains a key tool for making informed decisions in a market saturated with potentially risky products.

The European Commission has published a draft of the 23rd Draft Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) of the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) of Substances and Mixtures Regulation, formally known as Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008. This revision brings with it important changes for the cosmetics industry, introducing new entries and revising the classifications of 32 substances, of which eight are particularly relevant to this sector. 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP): List of substances Impact on the Cosmetics Industry: Safety and Labeling Next steps and challenges for compliance A step forward in the regulation of safe products ATP 23 focuses on updates that take into account the latest scientific and technical developments, ensuring that the European regulatory framework remains aligned with current and emerging risks associated with certain chemical substances. In the case of the cosmetics industry, this type of regulation is key, as it requires greater transparency and safety in products that are applied directly to the skin, hair or nails. 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP): List of substances List of substances included in the 23rd Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) of the CLP Regulation that affect the cosmetics industry: Ozone - Classification: Carcinogen and organ toxicant, used in oral care products. Nitrous Oxide (Dinitrogen) - Classification: Reproductive toxicant and organ damage, used as a propellant and fragrance. Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate - Classification: Reproductive toxicant and skin sensitizer, used as film former in cosmetics. Chrysanthemum Cinerariaefolium Flower Extract - Classification: toxic by inhalation and allergen, used as a fragrance. Methyl Oct-2-innate - Classification: Skin sensitizer, used in fragrances. Isophorone Diisocyanate - Classification: Acute toxicity and respiratory sensitizer, also used as film former. 3-Iodo-2-propynyl butylcarbamate - Classification: toxic by inhalation and harmful to eyes, used as a preservative. Tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate - (repeated) Classification: Reproductive toxicant, with film-forming function. These compounds are under review and may be banned if exemptions are not obtained from the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) . This draft shows the EU's commitment to keeping safe products on the market. Impact on the Cosmetics Industry: Safety and Labeling The proposed draft includes new classifications for substances that affect consumer safety and sets out stricter guidelines for labelling. This means that cosmetics manufacturers will have to adapt their formulas or product labelling in accordance with these updates, especially for substances that were not previously regulated as rigorously. For the industry, compliance with these regulations is essential to ensure that products on the European market meet high standards of safety and transparency. Correct classification and labelling not only allows consumers to be better informed, but also reduces risks associated with the prolonged use of certain ingredients. Next steps and challenges for compliance The draft 23rd ATP is currently undergoing public consultation, a process that allows companies, industry associations and other stakeholders to provide feedback and suggestions before the proposal is formalised. This process is crucial as it provides an opportunity to analyse how these changes will affect the supply chain, production and marketing of cosmetic products across the European Union. Following the consultation and review phase, ATP 23 is expected to enter into force in 2024. Once approved, cosmetics manufacturers will have a transition period to adjust their processes and labelling in accordance with the new requirements. A step forward in the regulation of safe products The update to the CLP Regulation underlines the European Commission's commitment to ensuring that cosmetic products sold in the region are safe and correctly labelled. It also highlights the value of keeping up to date with regulations to protect both businesses and consumers in a dynamic and demanding market. In summary, the 23rd ATP is a key element for the future of labelling and classification of substances in cosmetics within the EU. The cosmetics industry must prepare to adapt to these changes, ensuring compliance with regulations and maintaining consumer confidence in the safety and transparency of the products they purchase.

The GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe) list is a safety standard of the Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) of the United States, which evaluates flavoring ingredients recognized as safe under specific conditions of use. This scientific review is crucial for the food industry, allowing for the controlled and safe use of flavours in products consumed globally. In this article, we will explore the main features of the GRAS 31 list, its impact on the food industry and its influence on international regulations. Introduction Background Scientific Evaluation and Review Methodology Key Features of GRAS List 31 Importance and Relevance of the GRAS 31 List in the Industry Challenges and Future Updates Conclusion Introduction: GRAS and FEMA Food safety is a priority for consumers and regulators in the food industry. The GRAS List, periodically revised by FEMA, plays an essential role in providing a standard based on scientific evaluations of flavor ingredients. In May 2024, FEMA published the latest update, GRAS List 31, which introduces new substances and adjustments based on recent advances in food chemistry and toxicology. Background and Origin of the GRAS List The GRAS List was established to comply with the Food Additives Amendment of 1958, under the FDA regulations in the USA, which regulates the ingredients that can be used in foods. FEMA began evaluating flavors for GRAS in the 1960s, in response to the need for an evidence-based evaluation system for nontraditional ingredients used in the food and beverage industry. Scientific Evaluation and Review Methodology FEMA Expert Panel : Ingredient review is conducted by a panel of scientists specializing in toxicology, medicine, and chemistry. This group analyzes each substance under specific conditions of use and evaluates its safety through a combination of toxicity testing, exposure analysis, and review of scientific literature. Open and Transparent Review : FDA regulations require that GRAS determinations be public, allowing for "general recognition" of ingredient safety for consumers and businesses. Key Features of GRAS List 31 Ongoing Update and Evaluation of New Ingredients: The list is regularly reviewed and updated to reflect advances in scientific research. In GRAS 31, new flavoring substances were introduced and others, such as 3-acetyl-2,5-dimethylfuran (FEMA 3391 ), were removed due to lack of conclusive safety evidence. Specific Use Levels : The list provides recommended safe use levels for each ingredient in different food categories, such as dairy products, beverages, confectionery, and sauces. These levels ensure proper use and minimize the risk of toxicity. Importance and Relevance of the GRAS 31 List in the Industry Impact in the US and around the world : Although it is a US regulation, many global companies follow these standards to meet the high safety requirements. Some countries and international bodies, such as the Codex Alimentarius, also consult the GRAS list as a reference. Trust and Compliance in the Food Industry : The GRAS list strengthens consumer confidence by ensuring that flavors used in products are safe under specific conditions of use. This is especially important in a context where ingredient transparency is increasingly demanded by consumers. Challenges and Future Updates Need for Strong Scientific Evidence : Each ingredient must have supporting scientific data, which may limit the inclusion of some ingredients with less available research. However, the FEMA panel continues to evaluate new research to ensure the list remains current. Impact of Technological Innovation : The emergence of new production methods and natural compounds in the food market creates additional challenges for safety assessment, and future editions of the list are expected to include more precise criteria for these innovative ingredients. Conclusion FEMA’s GRAS 31 List is a crucial tool for the food industry , not only in the United States, but also globally. Through regular scientific reviews, it provides a secure basis for the use of flavouring ingredients, strengthening consumer confidence and ensuring the safety of food products. The May 2024 update marks a significant step in adapting safety regulations to the demands of a constantly evolving industry.

Washington, DC - The Flavor and Extract Manufacturers Association (FEMA) has released the latest update to its GRAS List, also known as GRAS 31, as of May 2024. This list is essential for the food industry , as it includes flavor substances recognized as safe for use in foods and beverages under specific conditions. In this edition, FEMA has decided to remove 3-acetyl-2,5-dimethylfuran (FEMA 3391), citing a lack of conclusive data on its safety. At the same time, new ingredients have been added and safe use in several food categories has been specified. Backed by scientific research and compliance with U.S. food additive regulations, GRAS 31 continues to position itself as an indispensable reference for food manufacturers seeking to offer safe, high-quality products to their consumers. May 2024 Update Modifications and Withdrawals New Inclusions and Levels of Use Relevance and Security May 2024 Update This edition of the GRAS 31 list was published in May 2024 and includes detailed revisions and new substances added to the inventory of safe ingredients. The latest revision responds to scientific advances and ensures that safety assessments remain up to date. Modifications and Withdrawals One of the important changes in GRAS 31 was the removal of the ingredient 3-acetyl-2,5-dimethylfuran (FEMA 3391) from the list. This compound was removed due to the lack of conclusive evidence on its safety in current food uses. New Inclusions and Levels of Use The list also introduces new flavoring ingredients with specific recommendations on average and maximum usage levels in different categories, such as dairy products, confectionery, sauces and beverages. These levels help the industry determine the appropriate amount to achieve the desired flavor without compromising consumer safety. Relevance and Security The GRAS list is essential to maintaining consumer confidence in food products, as it ensures that all flavor ingredients have been evaluated by experts in toxicology, medicine, and food chemistry. This review process is crucial, given that flavor ingredients are increasingly present in a wide variety of foods.

Recent updates to cosmetic product regulation in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) reflect an increasingly stringent commitment to the safety, transparency and cultural appropriateness of products in the marketplace. Starting in 2024, the government has implemented new regulations requiring thorough microbiological and heavy metal safety testing in accredited laboratories for all imported cosmetics, along with detailed labeling requirements in English and Arabic. Labels must include specific warnings about safe use and any potential allergic reactions, with medical claims also prohibited. These regulations, largely aligned with EU regulations, have also introduced restrictions on sensitive ingredients such as vitamin A derivatives and certain acids, as well as ensuring that all products comply with the cultural values of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). UAE Ingredient Labeling and Analysis Requirements ECAS Certification and Safety Review in Accredited Laboratories Ingredient Restrictions and Compliance with International Standards Product Presentation and Design Standards UAE Ingredient Labeling and Analysis Requirements Date: September 2024 Summary: New regulations require all cosmetic products to comply with strict labelling requirements in English and Arabic. Labelling must include warnings about proper use of the product, possible allergic reactions and precautions. In addition, any ingredients with allergens must be highlighted, and medical claims are prohibited on labels. These changes align with EU regulations, especially in the control of ingredients such as alpha-hydroxy acids and vitamin A and its derivatives, which are permitted only under specific conditions. ECAS Certification and Safety Review in Accredited Laboratories Date: October 2024 Overview: The Emirates Conformity Assessment Scheme (ECAS) certification , managed by the Ministry of Industry and Advanced Technology (MoIAT), is now mandatory for all cosmetics in the UAE market. This scheme requires each product to pass tests for microbiological safety and contaminants, particularly heavy metals, in accredited laboratories. The aim is to ensure that cosmetics are safe for human use and meet quality standards. Companies must register their products with Dubai’s Montaji system in order to legally distribute them on the market. Ingredient Restrictions and Compliance with International Standards Date : September 2024 Summary: In this update, the UAE has implemented an expanded list of banned or restricted ingredients for cosmetics. These include vitamin A derivatives (such as retinol and its esters), which can only be used in low concentrations and with clear safety warnings. Cosmetics must also be free of pork-derived products to align with the cultural and religious values of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Authorities in Dubai and other municipalities oversee and monitor compliance with these regulations to ensure consumer safety. Product Presentation and Design Standards Date: April 2024 Abstract: Authorities have set new guidelines to prevent cosmetic products from featuring images or messages that contradict Islamic traditions or GCC social values. Products must also be presented in packaging that provides all mandatory information on safety and proper use. In addition, any cosmetic compounds containing nano-ingredients must be specified on the label and comply with concentration and size restrictions, in line with international recommendations. These updates reinforce the UAE’s commitment to ensuring that only safe and culturally appropriate products are placed on the market , thereby supporting confidence in the region’s ever-expanding cosmetics sector.

This document describes the requirements, the process of obtaining and the importance of the ECAS (Emirates Conformity Assessment Scheme) certificate, required for the import of cosmetic products into the United Arab Emirates . The ECAS certificate ensures compliance with the quality and safety standards set by the UAE federal government and is a mandatory measure for all cosmetic importers in the region. Introduction Definition and Objective of the ECAS Certificate Importance of ECAS Certificate for Cosmetics Importation Procedure for obtaining the ECAS Certificate Specific Technical Requirements for Cosmetic Products Conclusion Introduction As a hub for trade and consumption of high-quality products, the United Arab Emirates sets strict regulations to ensure the safety and quality of products entering its market. The ECAS (Emirates Conformity Assessment Scheme), overseen by the MOIAT (Ministry of Industry and Advanced Technology, formerly known as ESMA), is a mandatory certification system that ensures cosmetic products meet federal quality and safety standards in the UAE. This white paper focuses on the fundamentals and process of ECAS certification for imported cosmetics. Definition and Objective of the ECAS Certificate The ECAS certificate is a conformity assessment system used to verify that cosmetic products meet UAE standards. This process involves evaluating the composition, labelling and safety testing of the product, with the aim of ensuring that they do not pose risks to the health of the consumer. 1.1. Background of MOIAT (formerly ESMA) The Ministry of Industry and Advanced Technology (MOIAT) has taken over the responsibilities of the Emirates Agency for Standards (ESMA) and currently manages the ECAS system. The ministry is tasked with developing and implementing standards and regulations in various sectors, including cosmetics, to promote safety and sustainability in the Emirati market. Importance of ECAS Certificate for Cosmetics Importation The ECAS certificate is a mandatory requirement for importing and marketing cosmetics in the United Arab Emirates. Its purpose is to protect public health and ensure that products meet quality specifications. 2.1. Quality and Safety Standards This certificate ensures that cosmetic products have been evaluated in terms of composition, formulation, purity, labelling and safety testing. This includes specific regulations for permitted ingredients, as well as safety warnings and labelling in Arabic. 2.2. Risk Prevention The regulation seeks to mitigate risks associated with harmful ingredients, such as banned chemicals and other contaminants. In this way, the certificate guarantees that imported cosmetics do not pose threats to the health of consumers. Procedure for obtaining the ECAS Certificate The process of obtaining ECAS certification involves several stages that must be managed precisely to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. The most relevant steps are detailed below. 3.1. Documentation Evaluation The importer must submit product documentation, including laboratory test reports supporting the safety and efficacy of the cosmetic. These reports must be in compliance with UAE and MOIAT standards. 3.2. Safety and Quality Testing Products must undergo laboratory testing to assess aspects such as stability, toxicity and microbiology. These tests must be carried out in laboratories approved by the UAE government or in facilities that comply with international standards recognised by MOIAT. 3.3. Product Registration in the MOIAT System Once the product has passed safety and quality tests, the importer must register the cosmetic on the MOIAT online platform. This registration includes detailed information about the product, its composition and labelling. 3.4. Certification and Labeling Once approved, the ECAS certificate is granted, allowing the product to be imported and distributed in the UAE. Products must carry appropriate labelling and, in some cases, the ECAS logo, indicating their compliance with local regulations. Specific Technical Requirements for Cosmetic Products Quality and safety standards for cosmetic products include detailed regulations regarding ingredients, packaging, labeling and testing. 4.1. Regulations on Allowed and Prohibited Ingredients MOIAT has specific lists of prohibited and restricted ingredients in cosmetic products. Ingredients that have been shown to be toxic or potentially harmful, such as certain parabens and phthalates, are prohibited. 4.2. Labeling and Warnings Products must contain labels in Arabic and English detailing the proper use of the cosmetic, safety warnings, and the complete list of ingredients. 4.3. Validity of the Certificate The ECAS certificate has a validity period that varies depending on the type of product and must be renewed in accordance with current regulations. This validity ensures continued compliance and allows authorities to carry out periodic checks to ensure compliance. Conclusion The ECAS certificate is essential for the import and marketing of cosmetic products in the UAE. It ensures that products meet the quality and safety standards set by the government, protecting consumers and maintaining high levels of quality in the market. Compliance with this requirement not only ensures the legal entry of products, but also strengthens consumer confidence in the safety and efficacy of cosmetics available in the Emirati market. References Ministry of Industry and Advanced Technology (MOIAT). “Import Regulations for Cosmetics in the UAE.” Government of the United Arab Emirates, 2023. ESMA. "Technical Regulation for Cosmetics and Personal Care Products". Emirates Standards Agency, 2020. UAE Trade Publications. "Cosmetic Products Importers Guide". Dubai Chamber of Commerce, 2022.

Proper waste management is a priority in the European Union (EU ), especially in the context of sustainable development and the circular economy. To ensure proper disposal and recycling of products, EU legislation imposes a number of requirements on the use of waste symbols on products and packaging. These symbols are intended to inform consumers about how to dispose of products responsibly and to ensure that materials are recycled correctly. Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 1994 on packaging and packaging waste, known as 62 EC of the Parliament, provides the legal basis for these regulations. In this article, we will explore the requirements and regulations regarding waste symbols in the EU, their purpose, and how companies should comply with these regulations to ensure proper environmental management. Introduction to Waste Symbols in the European Union Main Waste Symbols Required in the European Union 1. Green Point 2. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Symbol 3. Plastic Recycling Symbols 4. Glass Recycling Symbol 5. Recyclable Paper and Cardboard 6. Compostability Symbol 7. Hazardous Waste Symbols Key Regulations Governing Waste Symbols in the EU 1. Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste 2. Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) 3. Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste Producer Responsibility Recycling and Recovery Obligation to provide information Compliance with Waste Symbol Regulations Annexes Conclusion Introduction to Waste Symbols in the European Union European legislation sets clear rules for waste management, and one of the pillars of this regulation is the correct information to the consumer through waste symbols . These symbols indicate the type of material from which the product or packaging is made, as well as instructions for its disposal. The use of standardized symbols facilitates recycling and promotes environmentally responsible behavior among citizens. In addition, the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and the EU Directive regulate the use of these symbols, establishing new obligations and requirements for packaging regulations in the European Union. Waste symbols are essential to comply with directives such as the Packaging Waste Directive (94/62/EC) , the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive (2012/19/EU) , and the Waste Directive (2008/98/EC) . All of these regulations underline the importance of properly informing consumers about how to handle waste. Main Waste Symbols Required in the European Union There are several symbols recognised in the EU to indicate how waste generated by products and packaging should be disposed of or recycled. Below we present the most common symbols and their respective regulations. The European Commission has established concrete measures to ensure compliance with these regulations and to promote sustainability and recycling throughout the EU. 1. Green Point The Green Dot symbol is one of the most widely recognised symbols in the EU. This symbol indicates that the manufacturer of the product has contributed financially to a national packaging waste management system. However, it is important to note that the Green Dot does not necessarily indicate that the packaging is recyclable, but that the producer complies with legal obligations to finance recycling. This symbol is mandatory in many EU countries, especially those that have adopted Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) systems, meaning that companies must finance or manage the collection and recycling of waste generated by their products. 2. Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Symbol The WEEE symbol, represented by a wheeled bin with a cross, is mandatory on all electrical and electronic products sold in the EU. This symbol informs consumers that the product must not be disposed of with household waste, but must be taken to a specialised collection point for safe recycling. Directive 2012/19/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates the management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in this context. The WEEE Directive establishes that manufacturers and distributors of electronic products are responsible for organizing and financing the collection, treatment and recycling of equipment once it reaches the end of its useful life. 3. Plastic Recycling Symbols For plastic products, the EU uses a series of plastic resin identification codes that indicate the type of material of the packaging or product. These symbols consist of a triangle of arrows with a number in the centre ranging from 1 to 7, and an abbreviation below that indicates the type of plastic. The most common codes include: • PET (Polyethylene Terephthalate) : Number 1, commonly used in beverage bottles. • HDPE (High Density Polyethylene) : Number 2, used in products such as detergent containers and bags. • PVC (Polyvinyl Chloride) : Number 3, used in rigid packaging and construction products. • LDPE (Low Density Polyethylene) : Number 4, used in plastic bags and flexible packaging. These symbols enable recycling centres to sort plastics appropriately and ensure that materials are recycled efficiently. In addition, the new developments introduced by Directive 94/62/EC in the management of plastic waste have significantly improved these processes. 4. Glass Recycling Symbol The glass recycling symbol, represented by three arrows in a circle surrounding a glass bottle, indicates that the container must be recycled properly at glass collection points. This symbol is mandatory on glass containers, such as bottles and jars, and is essential to promote the recycling of this material, which can be recycled indefinitely without losing quality. Furthermore, the Proposal for an EU Regulation on glass packaging recycling seeks to establish clear and harmonised obligations between Member States to promote sustainability and recycling in Europe. 5. Recyclable Paper and Cardboard The recycling symbol for paper and cardboard consists of a triangle of arrows surrounding the Paper or cardboard symbol. This symbol indicates that the material can be recycled and must be disposed of in the appropriate containers. It is mandatory on cardboard boxes, brochures, magazines and other paper products sold in the EU. In addition, a specific database is used to analyse the management of paper and cardboard waste, which helps to measure and manage their environmental impact. 6. Compostability Symbol The compostability symbol guarantees that a product or packaging is compostable according to European standards (EN 13432). This symbol is present on products that can be decomposed under industrial composting conditions and that do not leave toxic residues. It is common on packaging and products made from biodegradable materials, such as certain plastics or products derived from plants. Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council regulates compostable materials in the context of packaging and packaging waste. 7. Hazardous Waste Symbols Products containing hazardous substances, such as batteries, chemicals or Certain electronic devices must bear specific symbols indicating the associated risks. These symbols, based on the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for the classification and labelling of chemicals, warn users about potential health or environmental hazards and how they should be disposed of safely. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament regulates the management of hazardous waste, establishing regulations for its correct disposal. Key Regulations Governing Waste Symbols in the EU 1. Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste EU Directive 94/62/EC sets out requirements for the management of packaging and packaging waste in the EU. It aims to reduce the environmental impact of packaging and promote reuse, recycling and other methods of waste recovery. The directive requires producers to use recyclable materials and to appropriately label packaging with waste symbols. 2. Directive 2012/19/EU on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) The WEEE Directive regulates the management of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Manufacturers must ensure that all electronic products are labelled with the WEEE symbol and arrange for the proper collection and treatment of electronic waste. In addition, the European Commission has set out specific measures to ensure compliance with the WEEE Directive. 3. Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste This directive sets the general legal framework for waste management in the EU, promoting the waste hierarchy (prevention, reuse, recycling, and energy recovery before disposal). It requires that products and packaging be clearly labelled with appropriate symbols to facilitate recycling or safe disposal. Furthermore, the proposed EU Regulation seeks to establish clear and harmonised obligations between Member States in relation to waste and packaging management. Producer Responsibility Producer responsibility is a key concept in Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste . Under this directive, packaging producers have an obligation to design and manufacture their products in such a way as to minimise their environmental impact. This includes reducing the amount of waste generated, as well as promoting the reuse and recycling of packaging. In the European Union , this responsibility applies to all types of packaging, including plastic, glass, paper and cardboard. Producers must comply with the basic requirements set out in Directive 94/62/EC , which cover reducing the weight and volume of packaging, using recycled materials and minimising the amount of waste generated. Furthermore, producer responsibility extends to the management of packaging waste. This means that producers must ensure that packaging waste is collected and treated appropriately, minimising the amount of waste sent to landfills. This approach not only helps to reduce environmental impact, but also fosters a more sustainable circular economy. Recycling and Recovery Recycling and recovery of packaging are essential to reduce the amount of waste generated and minimise the environmental impact. Directive 94/62/EC establishes clear recycling and recovery objectives to be achieved by the Member States of the European Union . Packaging recycling involves transforming used materials into new products, which can include recycling plastics, glass, paper and cardboard. Packaging recovery, on the other hand, refers to using the materials to produce energy or fuel. Both processes are essential to closing the life cycle of products and promoting more efficient waste management. The European Commission has set specific recycling and recovery targets for packaging, which Member States must meet. These targets include recycling 65% of plastic packaging, 70% of glass packaging and 75% of paper and cardboard packaging. Meeting these targets is crucial to moving towards a more sustainable economy and reducing dependence on natural resources. Obligation to provide information The reporting obligation is a fundamental requirement for the implementation of Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste . Packaging producers must provide detailed information on the materials used, the quantity of waste generated and the management of this waste. This information must be accessible to both the competent authorities and consumers. Producers must also report on the recyclability and recovery of packaging, as well as on waste management practices. This transparency is essential to ensure responsibility and sustainability in the management of packaging and packaging waste. The European Commission has set specific reporting requirements that producers must comply with. These requirements ensure that a high level of transparency and accountability is maintained throughout the supply chain, thus facilitating more efficient and sustainable management of packaging and packaging waste. Compliance with Waste Symbol Regulations To ensure compliance with the Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive and other EU waste symbol regulations, businesses must: • Ensure that all products and packaging are properly labelled with appropriate waste symbols . • Collaborate with national waste management systems and comply with Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) obligations. • Conduct an assessment of the materials used in products and packaging to identify the waste symbols to be used. • Stay up to date with updates to European regulations and changes to waste symbols . Failure to comply with these requirements may result in financial penalties and product recalls, which can seriously impact a company's reputation and operations. Annexes Annexes are complementary documents to Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste . These documents provide additional information on the implementation of the directive, including technical requirements and quality standards for packaging and packaging waste. The annexes also detail crucial aspects such as packaging waste management, recycling and recovery, as well as producer responsibility and reporting obligations . These documents are essential to ensure that the EU Member States implement the directive effectively and uniformly. The European Commission has developed these annexes to provide clear and detailed guidance on how to comply with the requirements of the directive. Compliance with these annexes is essential to ensure proper management of packaging and packaging waste, thus promoting a circular and sustainable economy throughout the European Union. Conclusion Waste symbols are an essential component of the European Union 's strategy to promote recycling and responsible waste management. Complying with product and packaging labelling regulations is not only a legal obligation, but also an opportunity for companies to demonstrate their commitment to sustainability and environmental care. By using these symbols appropriately, companies can facilitate recycling and contribute to the circular economy objectives promoted by the EU.

Claims on cosmetic products, or declarations of properties, play a crucial role in the marketing of these products. Current legislation, particularly Regulation (EU) No 655/2013, regulates the standards and criteria that claims on cosmetic products must meet. These claims must comply with current legislation to ensure the truthfulness and legality of the marketing of products. These claims refer to statements made by manufacturers about the efficacy, characteristics or benefits of a cosmetic product, with the aim of influencing consumers' purchasing decisions. In the European Union, Regulation 655/2013 establishes the common criteria that cosmetic product claims must meet, ensuring that they are clear, truthful and not misleading. In this article, we will explore in depth the regulatory framework for cosmetic claims and how it affects the industry. Introduction to Claims in Cosmetic Products Regulation 655/2013: Common Criteria for Cosmetic Claims The Six Key Criteria of Regulation 655/2013 1. Legal Compliance 2. Truthfulness 3. Efficacy Tests 4. Honesty 5. Clarity for the Consumer 6. Fairness in Competition Types of Claims in Cosmetic Products 1. Functional Claims 2. Sensory Claims 3. Ethical or Environmental Claims 4. Claims Based on Ingredients 5. Claims Free of Scientific Evidence to Support the Claims Claims Control and Market Surveillance Consequences for the Cosmetics Industry Conclusion Introduction to Claims in Cosmetic Products Claims in cosmetic products are statements that describe the properties or benefits of a product. These may include aspects such as: • Prolonged hydration . • Wrinkle reduction . • Improves skin tone . • Sun protection . Such claims are essential to differentiate a product from the competition and communicate its added value to the consumer. However, in the European Union , there is strict regulation that establishes how these claims must be formulated in order to avoid practices that are misleading or deceptive to consumers. It is crucial to provide consumers with true and clear information about the characteristics and effectiveness of cosmetics. Regulation 655/2013: Common Criteria for Cosmetic Claims Regulation (EU) No 655/2013 establishes common criteria and essential elements for the justification of claims made on cosmetic products. Regulation 655/2013 defines these elements, ensuring that claims are truthful and supported by appropriate testing. This regulation applies to all claims appearing on labelling, packaging, marketing and advertising materials, as well as in online communication. The main objective of this regulation is to ensure that claims are: • Truthful . • Justified with evidence . • Not misleading . • Clearly understandable by the consumer . Furthermore, this regulation promotes fair competition between cosmetic product manufacturers, ensuring that claims about the efficacy of products are supported by scientific evidence and are not misleading. The Six Key Criteria of Regulation 655/2013 The regulation sets out six key criteria that all claims on cosmetic products must meet. These criteria ensure that the claims made about a product are consistent, verifiable and not misleading. 1. Legal Compliance The first criterion states that claims must not contravene current regulations, such as Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and Regulation 655/2013. For example, claims suggesting that a cosmetic product has curative or medical properties are prohibited, as such claims are reserved for medicines. 2. Truthfulness All claims must be based on facts and a truthful claim. If a product contains an ingredient in a minimal concentration, a disproportionate claim cannot be made about the impact of that ingredient. For example, if a product contains 0.01% aloe vera extract, the amount or benefits of aloe vera should not be exaggerated in the product's advertising. 3. Efficacy Tests Claims must be supported by scientific evidence or experimental data. Companies must be able to demonstrate that the product has the effects it claims. This may include clinical studies, laboratory evaluations, or consumer tests that demonstrate the product's effectiveness under specified conditions. 4. Honesty Claims must be honest and must not give a false impression about the product or its effects. For example, if a cosmetic includes a patented technology, advertising must clarify what the real benefit of that technology is and not make exaggerated claims that could mislead the consumer. 5. Clarity for the Consumer Claims should be clear and understandable to the average consumer. Claims should be expressed in plain language and avoid jargon that could confuse. In addition, claims should not be made that a cosmetic product has benefits beyond what it can reasonably offer. 6. Fairness in Competition Claims should not disparage other products or exaggerate differences with competitors. The aim is to promote an environment of fair competition in which claims are based on product quality and not on misleading comparisons. Types of Claims in Cosmetic Products There are several types of claims used on cosmetic products to highlight their properties and benefits. The most common types are described below: 1. Functional Claims These claims refer to the tangible effects the product has on the skin, hair, or other parts of the body. For example, “visibly reduces wrinkles,” “hydrates skin for 24 hours,” or “broad-spectrum UV protection.” 2. Sensory Claims This type of claim focuses on the sensations that the product provokes during use, such as texture or aroma. Examples include: "immediate feeling of freshness" or "light texture that is absorbed quickly." 3. Ethical or Environmental Claims More and more consumers are looking for products that are environmentally friendly or not tested on animals. Claims such as "vegan product", "cruelty-free" or "recyclable packaging" are becoming more and more common. 4. Claims Based on Ingredients These types of claims highlight the presence of specific ingredients in the product, such as “with hyaluronic acid” or “contains aloe vera extracts”. The term ‘term’ is used in this context to describe claims made about ingredients, seeking to enhance the properties of the product and attract the attention of the consumer. 5. Claims Free of Claims indicating the absence of certain ingredients, such as "paraben-free," "sulfate-free," or "silicone-free," are popular among consumers looking to avoid certain ingredients in their cosmetics. Scientific Evidence to Support the Claims One of the main requirements of Regulation 655/2013 is that all claims must be supported by adequate scientific evidence. This may include: • Clinical studies : Controlled tests on consumer groups that demonstrate the effectiveness of the product under real-life conditions of use. • Laboratory evaluations : Technical analyses that validate the properties of the product or its ingredients. • In vitro testing : Laboratory experiments on cells or tissues to measure the effect of certain ingredients. • Consumer evaluations : Surveys or user tests conducted with consumers to obtain their opinion on the product and its effects. It is important that the evidence is relevant and designed to support the specific claims made about the product. It must also be available to the relevant authorities in the event of a review. Scientific evidence is crucial to support claims in the cosmetics industry. Claims Control and Market Surveillance Competent authorities in each EU Member State are responsible for monitoring compliance with the regulations on cosmetic product claims. This includes reviewing product labelling and advertising to ensure that claims are truthful and substantiated. If misleading claims or claims not supported by sufficient evidence are detected, authorities may require that the product be withdrawn from the market or that the claims be modified to comply with regulations. Consequences for the Cosmetics Industry The regulation of claims on cosmetic products has raised the bar for companies in the sector. It is no longer enough to highlight the properties of a product in an attractive way; it is now necessary to support each claim with solid scientific evidence and ensure that the claims are clear, honest and understandable to the consumer. This regulatory environment has led companies to invest more in research and development to justify their claims, which in turn has driven innovation in the cosmetics industry. Furthermore, transparency and accuracy in claims have improved consumer confidence in cosmetic products available in the market. Conclusion Cosmetic product claims are a powerful marketing tool, but they must comply with Regulation 655/2013 to ensure that they are truthful, fair and supported by scientific evidence. The regulation ensures that consumers are not misled by false or exaggerated claims and that companies compete fairly in the European market. By complying with the criteria set by this regulation, companies can improve consumer confidence and promote transparency in the cosmetics sector.

The United Kingdom has taken a further step towards stricter regulation of cosmetic products. On 3 October 2024, the country notified the World Trade Organization (WTO) of a proposed amendment to the Great Britain (GB) Cosmetics Regulations, which includes a ban on 13 additional substances classified as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic to reproduction (CMR). New Chapter in UK Cosmetics Regulation Substances Exclusively Banned by the United Kingdom Comparison with the European Union Impact of Revised Transition Periods The Impact of Brexit on Cosmetics Regulation Conclusion: A Future of Greater Compliance and Oversight Links of interest New Chapter in UK Cosmetics Regulation This new regulation represents the second wave of CMR substance bans in the UK , the first being in April 2024, when 52 substances were restricted through the same legislation. This series of amendments reflects the growing divergence between UK and EU regulations since Brexit, with the UK imposing restrictions on substances that remain permitted in the EU. Substances Exclusively Banned by the United Kingdom Substances banned by the UK under this new amendment include: Thiophanate-methyl (ISO) – CAS: 23564-05-8 Mancozeb (ISO) – CAS: 8018-01-7 Carbendazim (ISO) – CAS: 10605-21-7 Trinickel disulfide; nickel subsulfide – CAS: 12035-72-2 / 12035-71-1 4-vinylcyclohexene diepoxide – CAS: 106-87-6 1,2,4-triazole – CAS: 288-88-0 Flumioxazine (ISO) – CAS: 103361-09-7 Tellurium – CAS: 13494-80-9 Daminozide (ISO) – CAS: 1596-84-5 Dimoxystrobin (ISO) – CAS: 149961-52-4 2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethanol – CAS: 111-77-3 Divanadium pentoxide – CAS: 1314-62-1 2-ethylhexanoic acid salts Comparison with the European Union Despite areas of alignment between UK and EU regulations, the divergent approach is evident. The substances mentioned above are banned only in the UK, while the EU has chosen to ban other substances that are not restricted in the UK, such as: Azamethiphos (ISO) – CAS: 35575-96-3 Pentasodium (carboxylatemethyl)iminobis(ethylenenitrile)tetraacetate – CAS: 140-01-2 Diphenyl(2,4,6-trimethylbenzene)phosphine oxide – CAS: 75980-60-8, among others. Impact of Revised Transition Periods In addition to expanding the list of prohibited substances, the amendment introduces new compliance deadlines for cosmetic products containing the restricted ingredients. As of April 20, 2025, companies will not be able to market products containing these ingredients, and October 20, 2025 will be the final deadline for such products to be available. Also, in relation to the Kojic Acid , a skin lightening agent that was added in April 2024 to Schedule III of the UK Cosmetics Regulations, the new compliance deadlines are: June 20, 2025 : Deadline for marketing products containing kojic acid. November 1, 2025 : final date for these products to be available on the market. The Impact of Brexit on Cosmetics Regulation With this new amendment, it is clear that the UK is taking a separate regulatory approach to that of the EU. This post-Brexit divergence underlines the growing need for beauty brands to ensure that their products comply with both regulatory frameworks if they wish to market in both territories. Conclusion: A Future of Greater Compliance and Oversight The tightening of the UK’s CMR chemical regulations shows a firm commitment to consumer protection and product safety. However, these new measures also represent a challenge for businesses, which will need to adapt quickly to a changing regulatory environment to avoid market disruption and meet strict deadlines set by the UK government. Links of interest World Trade Organization (WTO) – where the UK notified the amendment to the UK Cosmetics Regulation. You can find information about trade notifications on the official WTO website . UK legislation : For details of proposed and approved regulations on issues such as banning chemicals in cosmetics, please visit legislation.gov.uk . European Union - Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 : For the current EU cosmetics regulations, you can consult the database on the official EU website .

Product labelling in the European Union (EU) is a fundamental aspect in ensuring transparency, consumer safety and the movement of goods within the single market. Labelling requirements vary depending on the type of product, but they all have in common the objective of providing clear and accurate information to consumers. From food products to cosmetics and electronic devices, each category is regulated by specific regulations that must be strictly adhered to. In this article, we will explore labelling requirements in the European Union , focusing on the main sectors and regulations that govern product labelling to ensure legal compliance and consumer confidence. Introduction to EU Labelling Requirements General Regulations on Labelling in the European Union 1. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers 1.1 Mandatory Information on Food Labels 1.2 Labeling Requirements for Packaged Foods in the European Union 1.3 Nutritional and Health Information on Product Labels 1.4 Special Considerations for Food Supplements and Beverages 1.5 Labeling of Unpackaged Foods 1.6 Responsibility of the Food Business Operator 2. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products 3. Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS) and Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE) for Electrical and Electronic Equipment Legibility and Transparency Requirements in Labeling Labeling of Imported Products Common Symbols and Pictograms on EU Labelling Consequences of Non-Compliance with Labeling Requirements Conclusion Introduction to EU Labelling Requirements Product labelling in the EU is designed to provide consumers with essential information to enable them to make informed purchasing decisions. Key information that must be included on labels includes details about the product's composition, origin, safety warnings, instructions for use and expiration date, among others. Labelling must meet certain legibility requirements, meaning that the information must be clear, accurate and visible. The European Parliament plays a crucial role in creating these regulations. The EU labelling legislation applies to both products manufactured within the Union and those imported from third countries, ensuring that all products placed on the European market meet the same standards. General Regulations on Labelling in the European Union There are several general regulations covering labelling requirements in different sectors. Below are the main guidelines applicable to a variety of products: Labelling standards are essential to ensure the safety and health of consumers, especially in relation to information on allergens. 1. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 on the provision of food information to consumers This regulation sets out specific requirements for food labelling in the EU. Among the main obligations, it highlights the need to provide clear information on: • Product name . • List of ingredients , including allergens. • Quantity of certain ingredients (QUID). • Expiration date or best before date . • Storage instructions . • Country of origin or place of origin . • Nutritional information , including energy content and amounts of fat, carbohydrates, sugars, proteins, and salt. This labeling standard establishes how the ingredients and the amount of certain ingredients in food products must be indicated. The regulation also regulates the legibility of labelling , requiring that information be clear and in a minimum font size of 1.2 mm, to ensure that consumers can read it easily. 1.1 Mandatory Information on Food Labels Mandatory information on food labels is essential to ensure the safety and health of consumers. According to European Union regulations, packaged foods must include the following information: ● Name of the food : It must be clear and specific, allowing the consumer to easily identify the product. ● Ingredient List : All ingredients must be listed in descending order of weight, including any additives or allergens present. ● Net weight : The exact amount of product in the container. ● Expiration date : Indicating until when the food is safe for consumption. ● Allergen information : Any allergens present in the product must be clearly highlighted. ● Storage information : Instructions on how to store the product to maintain its quality and safety. Nutritional information is also essential for consumers to make informed choices about their diet. It should include energy value, amounts of fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugars, protein and salt. EU regulations ensure that this information is clear and accessible, allowing consumers to assess the nutritional content of the food they buy. 1.2 Labeling Requirements for Packaged Foods in the European Union Labelling requirements for packaged foods in the European Union are set out in Directive 79/112/EEC and Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. These requirements include: ● Font size : Mandatory information must be printed in a font with a minimum height of 1.2 millimetres. If the maximum surface area of the packaging is less than 80 cm², a minimum x-height of 0.9 mm may be used. ● Clarity and accuracy : Information should be clear and accurate, and should not be misleading. This ensures that consumers receive accurate and useful information about the products they purchase. These regulations ensure that consumers have access to essential information about packaged foods, allowing them to make informed and safe choices. 1.3 Nutritional and Health Information on Product Labels Nutritional and health information on product labels is essential to enable consumers to make informed decisions about their diet. Nutritional information should include: ● Energy value : Expressed in kilojoules (kJ) and kilocalories (kcal). ● Fat amounts : Including saturated fats. ● Carbohydrates : Including sugars. ● Proteins and salt : Exact quantities present in the product. In addition, health information on product labels must include: ● Health benefits : Information on the health benefits of the nutrients present in the food. ● Health risks : Information on the risks associated with excessive consumption of certain nutrients. This information allows consumers to evaluate how food products can affect their health and well-being, promoting a balanced and healthy diet. 1.4 Special Considerations for Food Supplements and Beverages Food supplements and beverages have specific labelling requirements. According to EU regulations, food supplements must include the following information: ● Ingredient List : All ingredients must be clearly listed. ● Quantity of ingredients with nutritional or physiological effect : Per the recommended daily dose of product. ● Allergen and storage information : Clear instructions on how to store the product and warnings about possible allergens. In addition, beverages must include the following information: ● List of ingredients : Detailing all the components of the product. ● Quantity of ingredients with nutritional or physiological effect : Per the recommended daily dose of product. ● Allergen and storage information : Ensuring that consumers are informed about how to store the product and any allergens present. These regulations ensure that consumers receive complete and accurate information about food supplements and beverages, allowing them to make informed decisions about their consumption. 1.5 Labeling of Unpackaged Foods Unpackaged foods also have specific labelling requirements. According to EU regulations, unpackaged foods must include the following information: ● Name of the food : It must be clear and specific. ● Ingredient List : All ingredients must be listed, highlighting any allergens present. ● Allergen and storage information : Clear instructions on how to store the product and warnings about possible allergens. In addition, unpackaged foods must comply with the labelling requirements set out in Directive 79/112/EEC and Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. This ensures that consumers receive the same quality of information, regardless of whether the food is packaged or not. 1.6 Responsibility of the Food Business Operator The food business operator is responsible for ensuring that the food placed on the market complies with the labelling requirements set out in EU regulations. This includes: ● Mandatory information on food labels : Ensuring that all required details are present and accurate. ● Nutritional and health information on product labels : Providing clear and useful data on nutritional content and health benefits. ● Labeling requirements for packaged and non-packaged foods : Complying with all applicable regulations for both types of products. ● Safe and healthy marketing : Ensuring that foods are marketed in a way that protects consumer health and safety. Fulfilling these responsibilities is crucial to maintaining consumer confidence and ensuring compliance with European labelling regulations. 2. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products Product labeling Cosmetics are regulated by Regulation 1223/2009 , which imposes strict requirements to ensure consumer safety. Labelling must include: • Name and address of the person responsible for the product . • Weight or volume of contents . • Minimum duration date or PAO symbol ("Period After Opening"). • Precautions for use . • List of ingredients in INCI nomenclature (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients). • Batch number for product identification. These requirements are intended to protect consumer health by ensuring that cosmetic products are safe and properly labeled for proper use. 3. Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS) and Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE) for Electrical and Electronic Equipment Labeling of appliances The recycling of electrical and electronic equipment is subject to two key directives: RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) and WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment). These regulations require electronic products to be properly labelled to inform consumers and facilitate proper recycling. • WEEE symbol : The crossed-out container symbol indicates that the product should not be disposed of with household waste, but at specific collection points. • CE Declaration of Conformity : Indicates that the product complies with European safety and quality regulations. • Batch or serial number : Necessary to identify and track the product. In addition, the labelling must include clear instructions on the safe use of the product, as well as warnings about any dangers associated with its use. 4. Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 on Textile Labelling Regulation 1007/2011 regulates the labelling of textile products in the EU, establishing that the label must contain: • Composition of the textile material (for example, 100% cotton, 50% polyester). • Care methods : clear instructions for washing, drying and ironing the product. • Country of origin : this must be indicated if the country where the item was produced is other than the EU. This regulation ensures that consumers receive accurate information about the composition and origin of textile products, promoting transparency in the market. 5. Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures The Regulation CLP sets out labelling requirements for chemicals and hazardous substances. Manufacturers must clearly label products with: • Hazard pictograms : These symbols warn users about the risks associated with the product (flammable, toxic, corrosive, etc.). • Signal words : Terms such as "danger" or "caution," depending on the level of risk. • Risk and precaution phrases : clear descriptions of specific risks and the measures that must be taken to avoid hazards. Compliance with these requirements is essential to protect human health and the environment, especially when handling hazardous chemicals. Legibility and Transparency Requirements in Labeling One of the key aspects of labelling in the European Union is the legibility of the information. According to the regulations, labels must: • Be clear and easily understandable for the consumer half. • Use a minimum font size (1.2 mm in most cases) to ensure text is legible. • Include information in the language of the country in which the product is marketed. For example, a product sold in Spain must be labeled in Spanish. Transparency is equally important. Companies should not include misleading or confusing information on labelling, such as claims that cannot be supported by adequate evidence or that may mislead the consumer. Labeling of Imported Products Products imported from outside the European Union must also comply with EU labelling requirements before being placed on the market. This means that importers must ensure that products are labelled in accordance with the relevant European regulations, including the translation of information into the local language and the inclusion of mandatory symbols or warnings. Incorrect or incomplete labelling can lead to penalties, including product recalls. It is therefore essential that importers work closely with manufacturers to ensure compliance. Common Symbols and Pictograms on EU Labelling In addition to text requirements, EU labelling includes a number of standardised symbols that must be present on certain products to comply with regulations. Some of the most common are: • CE marking : Indicates that the product complies with European safety, health and environmental protection regulations. • Green Dot : Indicates that the manufacturer has contributed to the financing of packaging recycling in a national system. • Hazard pictograms : Used on hazardous chemicals to warn of specific risks. These symbols help consumers quickly identify product features and precautions. Consequences of Non-Compliance with Labeling Requirements Failure to comply with EU labelling requirements can have serious consequences for businesses. Possible penalties include: • Financial fines . • Product withdrawal from the market . • Damage to the company's reputation , which can negatively affect sales and consumer confidence. To avoid these penalties, companies must ensure that all products they sell comply with European labelling regulations. Following the advice set out by the European Parliament and the Council can help avoid penalties and improve understanding and fairness in commercial transactions. Conclusion Labelling requirements in the European Union are strict and designed to protect consumers and ensure transparency in the market. Complying with these regulations is not only a legal obligation, but also an opportunity to build consumer trust and enhance brand reputation.

The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has published a key proposal for the cosmetics industry in Europe: the classification of Cannabidiol (CBD) as a CMR Reprotoxic substance. This proposal, promoted by France , seeks to include CBD among the chemical substances subject to strict regulation due to its potential effects on human reproduction. What is Cannabidiol? Cannabidiol (CBD) , identified by its CAS number 13956-29-1 , is a non-psychoactive compound derived from cannabis that has gained relevance in recent years, especially for its therapeutic benefits in cosmetic products. It is credited with soothing, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, which has made it a popular ingredient in products such as creams, oils and serums. However, the use of CBD in European cosmetics is surrounded by strict regulations. According to Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 , CBD can only be used in cosmetics if: It is of synthetic origin . It comes from parts of the cannabis plant that are not considered narcotics , such as the seeds and leaves not attached to the flowering tops. Furthermore, CBD must not contain Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) , the psychoactive substance present in cannabis, as it is prohibited in cosmetics. However, the regulation allows the presence of traces of THC if they are technically unavoidable, as stipulated in Article 17 of the aforementioned regulation. The Proposal for Classification of CBD as a CMR In September 2023, France took a step forward in regulating CBD by proposing its classification as a substance CMR Reprotoxic , i.e. as a chemical that can negatively affect human reproduction. If this classification is approved, CBD would enter the list of prohibited substances in cosmetic products under European regulations, unless a specific exemption is granted. This potential change has raised concerns in the cosmetics industry, which has seen CBD as a highly valuable ingredient due to its wide acceptance and multiple beneficial applications. Currently, CBD is not explicitly regulated in Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 , except when it is considered a narcotic, and it is also not present in the Annex VI of Regulation 1272/2008 (CLP) , which regulates the classification and labelling of hazardous substances. However, this proposed classification could mark a significant change in its future use. Impact on the Cosmetics Industry If CBD is classified as a CMR substance, its use in cosmetic products would be banned across the EU unless an exemption is in place. This regulation would affect a wide range of products currently containing CBD, forcing manufacturers to reformulate their products or, in some cases, withdraw them from the market. The public consultation on CBD classification is ongoing, giving stakeholders, including businesses and industry associations, the opportunity to voice their concerns and provide input before a final decision is made. Conclusion The possible classification of Cannabidiol as a CMR substance represents a significant challenge for the European cosmetics industry. While CBD has been a star ingredient in numerous products due to its beneficial properties, this new proposal could drastically limit its use. It is essential that companies remain attentive to the development of this regulation and take the necessary measures to comply with any regulations that may arise. As the public consultation progresses, and pending the final decision of ECHA and the European Commission , the cosmetics industry must prepare for possible changes in its formulations and commercial strategies. Staying up to date and being ready to adapt to emerging regulations is key to ensuring compliance and competitiveness in the European market. References Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on cosmetic products. Regulation 1272/2008 (CLP) on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. Proposal from the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) for the classification of Cannabidiol.

The Regulation 1223/2009 is the main legislative framework governing the manufacture, marketing and safety of cosmetic products in the European Union (EU) . This regulation has been designed to ensure that cosmetic products available on the European market are safe for consumers, and establishes clear and strict requirements for manufacturers, distributors and those responsible for these products. In this article, we will take an in-depth look at Regulation 1223/2009, its main provisions and its impact on the cosmetics industry. This regulation is a key regulation on cosmetic products in the European Union. Introduction to Regulation 1223/2009 Definition and Scope of the Regulation Main provisions of Regulation 1223/2009 1. Definition of Cosmetic Product 2. Responsibility of the Manufacturer or Importer 3. Safety Assessment 4. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) 5. Substance Restrictions 6. Requirements for the Marketing of Cosmetic Products 7. Animal Testing 8. Labeling and Transparency for the Consumer 9. Market Surveillance and Product Withdrawal 10. Annexes and Additional Provisions of the Regulation Application and Validity of the Regulation in the European Union Impact of Regulation 1223/2009 on the Cosmetics Industry Conclusion Introduction to Regulation 1223/2009 Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, adopted on 30 November 2009, entered into force on 11 July 2013, replacing Directive 76/768/EEC. This new legal framework was developed to harmonise regulations relating to cosmetic products within the European market, eliminating disparities between Member States and strengthening safety controls. The main objective of Regulation 1223/2009 is to protect human health by applying strict rules on the composition, labelling and safety assessment of cosmetic products before they are placed on the market. To this end, it establishes a series of responsibilities for cosmetic product manufacturers, as well as a control system based on shared responsibility between the competent national authorities and manufacturers. The regulation assigns responsibilities to any natural or legal person who markets cosmetic products in the European Union, ensuring that both manufacturers and importers are designated as 'responsible persons' to ensure compliance with legal obligations. Definition and Scope of the Regulation Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council is a fundamental regulation governing the marketing of cosmetic products in the European Union. This regulation establishes a clear and detailed framework to ensure that all cosmetic products available on the European market are safe for consumers. Its provisions include a precise definition of what constitutes a cosmetic product, as well as the requirements necessary for its marketing, safety and health protection. The regulation defines a cosmetic product as any substance or mixture intended to be applied to external parts of the human body, including the skin, hair, nails, lips and external genital organs, as well as teeth and oral mucosa, with the main purpose of cleaning, perfuming, modifying their appearance, protecting them, keeping them in good condition or correcting body odours. This definition is crucial to differentiate cosmetic products from other products such as medicines, which are subject to different regulations. Main provisions of Regulation 1223/2009 1. Definition of Cosmetic Product One of the first important aspects of the regulation is the clear definition of what constitutes a cosmetic product. According to the regulation, a cosmetic product is "any substance or mixture intended to be placed in contact with the external parts of the human body [...] or with the teeth and oral mucosa, for the exclusive or main purpose of cleaning them, perfuming them, modifying their appearance, protecting them, keeping them in good condition or correcting body odours". This definition establishes a clear distinction between cosmetic products and medicinal products, which has significant implications for applicable regulations and marketing requirements. 2. Responsibility of the Manufacturer or Importer The regulation assigns legal responsibility to the “person responsible” for the product, which may be the manufacturer or the importer in the case of products from outside the European Union. This responsible person must ensure that the product complies with all applicable regulations before it is placed on the European market. Their duties include: • Ensure that a safety assessment of the cosmetic product is carried out. • Maintain a Product Information File (PIF) containing all relevant data about the product, including its composition, safety testing, and the report of a qualified assessor. • Notify the European Commission about the product before it is placed on the market through the Cosmetic Product Notification Portal (CPNP). 3. Safety Assessment One of the central pillars of Regulation 1223/2009 is the obligation to carry out a safety assessment before any cosmetic product can be placed on the market. This assessment should be conducted by a qualified evaluator with a degree in pharmacy, toxicology, medicine or a related field, and should take into account both the individual ingredients of the product and its end use. The security assessment must be documented in a report, which forms part of the PIF , which must be available to the competent authorities of the Member States in the event of an inspection. 4. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) To ensure the quality and safety of cosmetic products, the regulation requires all manufacturers to comply with Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) , which are aligned with the ISO 22716 standard. These practices cover all stages of production, from the selection of raw materials to the storage and distribution of the final product, ensuring that cosmetic products are manufactured under controlled and standardized conditions. 5. Substance Restrictions Regulation 1223/2009 includes a list of prohibited and restricted substances that cannot be used in cosmetic products, or that can only be used under certain conditions. These lists are regularly updated to include new substances that may pose a risk to human health. The regulation also sets out specific prohibitions on the use of animal-derived ingredients in cosmetic products, especially those obtained through the slaughter of animals. 6. Requirements for the Marketing of Cosmetic Products For a cosmetic product to be marketed in the European Union, it must comply with a series of requirements established in Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. These requirements are essential to ensure the safety and protection of consumers' health. The main requirements include: ● Definition and Classification : The product must comply with the definition of a cosmetic product according to the regulation and be appropriately classified. ● Safety and Health Protection : Before being placed on the market, the product must undergo a safety assessment by a qualified assessor. This assessment must consider both the individual ingredients and the end use of the product. ● Consumer Information : Product labelling must provide clear and understandable information, including the name and address of the person responsible, the net content, the best-before date or PAO symbol, the list of ingredients and any precautions for use. ● Manufacturing and Quality Control : Manufacturers must follow Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) to ensure that products are manufactured under controlled and standardized conditions. ● Labeling and Presentation : Labeling must be clear, legible and understandable, and must comply with the standards established in the regulation. 7. Animal Testing A key aspect of Regulation 1223/2009 is the complete ban on animal testing for final cosmetic products as well as cosmetic ingredients. This ban has been a milestone in animal protection and has driven the development of alternative testing methods to ensure product safety without resorting to animal testing. 8. Labeling and Transparency for the Consumer The regulation sets out clear requirements on the information that must be provided to consumers through the labelling of cosmetic products. Mandatory information includes: • Name and address of the person responsible for the product. • Weight or volume of the contents. • Minimum duration date or PAO (Period After Opening) symbol. • List of ingredients using the INCI nomenclature (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients). • Precautions for use, if any. Furthermore, labelling must be clear, legible and understandable for consumers, thus guaranteeing their right to be informed about what they are buying and using. 9. Market Surveillance and Product Withdrawal The regulation also establishes market surveillance mechanisms that allow competent authorities to monitor the compliance of cosmetic products with current regulations. In the event that a product does not comply with the requirements or represents a risk to health, the person responsible for the product must take corrective measures, which may include withdrawing the product from the market. 10. Annexes and Additional Provisions of the Regulation Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 includes several annexes and additional provisions that provide specific details on the marketing of cosmetic products in the European Union. These annexes are essential to understand the technical and legal requirements that cosmetic products must meet. The main annexes include: ● Annex I : Establishes the requirements for the evaluation of the safety and health protection of cosmetic products. ● Annex II : Lists substances prohibited in the formulation of cosmetic products. ● Annex III : Details the substances that are permitted under certain restrictions. ● Annex IV : Provides a list of colorants permitted in cosmetic products. ● Annex V : Lists the permitted preservatives. ● Annex VI : Includes permitted UV filters. In addition to these annexes, the regulation contains additional provisions establishing specific rules for the marketing of cosmetic products, ensuring that all products meet safety and quality standards before reaching the consumer. Application and Validity of the Regulation in the European Union Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is applicable in all Member States of the European Union and has been valid since 11 July 2013. This regulation is mandatory for all natural or legal persons placing cosmetic products on the market in the European Union, ensuring a high level of health protection and safety for consumers. The European Commission The European Commission is responsible for the application and enforcement of the Regulation throughout the European Union. In addition, Member States are responsible for implementing and enforcing the Regulation in their respective territories. This includes market surveillance and taking corrective action in the event that products are detected that do not comply with the established requirements. In summary, Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 is a comprehensive regulation governing the marketing of cosmetic products in the European Union, setting clear rules for safety, health protection, consumer information, manufacturing and quality control, and product labelling. Its application in all Member States ensures a harmonised and safe market for cosmetic products in the EU. Impact of Regulation 1223/2009 on the Cosmetics Industry Regulation 1223/2009 has had a significant impact on the cosmetics industry, raising safety and quality standards. Companies must invest in rigorously assessing their products and creating efficient traceability systems to meet the requirements of the regulation. This has led to greater transparency and trust between consumers and cosmetic brands, while encouraging innovation in the development of safer and more sustainable products. Conclusion EU Regulation 1223/2009 is a comprehensive legal framework that ensures the safety of cosmetic products on the European market. By setting clear requirements on safety assessment, labelling, animal testing and good manufacturing practices, this regulation protects consumer health and encourages transparency and accountability within the cosmetics industry. It is essential that cosmetic manufacturers, distributors and product managers understand and comply with this regulation to avoid penalties and ensure success in the competitive EU beauty products market.